| SOXS 1.79 4.07% | NVDA 177.19 -4.16% | ONMD 1.02 44.60% | NFLX 96.24 13.77% | JEM 0.096 3.90% | ENSC 0.6232 57.77% | BYND 0.9456 15.32% | PLUG 1.79 -6.28% | SOFI 17.76 -7.02% | NVD 7.53 8.50% | TZA 6.23 5.06% | NU 14.98 -0.53% | DUST 3.54 -3.50% | BITO 9.06 -2.78% | EOSE 5.695 -15.50% | XLF 51.43 -2.04% | BAC 49.83 -4.72% | AAL 13.07 -6.24% | MARA 8.94 5.80% | VEEA 0.5071 17.33% | SPY 685.99 -0.48% | SOXL 62.77 -3.93% | SLV 84.99 5.64% | XWEL 1.49 9.56% | QQQ 607.29 -0.32% | ONDS 10.08 -3.54% | BHAT 0.0495 -11.13% | PSKY 13.51 20.84% | INTC 45.61 0.33% | F 14.095 -2.19% | AAPL 264.18 -3.21% | XLE 55.92 1.58% | TQQQ 49.52 -1.06% | TSLA 402.51 -1.49% | HYG 80.72 -0.16% | TSDD 9.18 2.91% | TSLL 14.7 -3.10% | BATL 5.52 33.01% | RKT 18.19 2.36% | RXT 1.95 -14.47% | TLT 90.82 0.61% | TSLS 5.64 1.62% | WBD 28.17 -2.19% | PATH 10.73 0.14% | CRWV 79.56 -18.51% | IBIT 37.19 -2.80% | LQD 111.68 -0.04% | SOUN 8.6015 -4.21% | PLTR 137.19 0.92% | CPNG 19.08 1.98%

UBS Downgrades Albemarle to Sell as Lithium Glut Threatens Earnings Outlook

Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) shares dropped more than 4% on Friday after UBS downgraded the company to Sell from Neutral, slashing its price target to $57 from $64, as the firm sees persistent oversupply in the lithium market weighing on the company's earnings through at least 2026.

Drawing on research from its global lithium team, UBS expects lithium prices to remain below $10/kg for the next two years—well under the $17–$18/kg mid-cycle levels that appear to be baked into Albemarle’s current valuation. While modest year-over-year gains in realized prices are still expected, UBS forecasts that lithium will stay in surplus for the foreseeable future, delaying any meaningful price recovery until later in the decade.

This bearish outlook translates into a 2026 EBITDA projection that is roughly 14% below consensus. UBS warns that the market is still pricing Albemarle shares based on overly optimistic assumptions, and that earnings expectations will likely need to reset lower in a “lower-for-longer” pricing scenario.

Despite potential investor interest in buying the dip, the firm sees more downside risk ahead, arguing that estimates need to be brought back in line with a more realistic view of the lithium supply-demand imbalance.

Published on: July 11, 2025