| LHAI 1.19 44.98% | VIVK 1.0213 30.28% | PPBT 2.25 35.54% | GPUS 0.2269 -4.42% | GELS 0.5808 9.17% | CANF 2.6362 -19.87% | GPRO 1.19 -3.25% | EOSE 3.3099 8.88% | VIOT 1.29 33.09% | JLHL 7.2101 28.29% | RITR 0.091 3.17% | NCPL 0.9599 21.20% | NIO 3.9201 -3.33% | DDC 0.355 3.65% | SOXS 52.78 1.07% | IBIT 43.41 -0.80% | KITT 0.7386 -7.21% | SOXL 104.47 -1.36% | HKPD 0.1527 -15.87% | XTNT 0.3952 7.39% | TQQQ 68.725 -0.61% | UFG 0.54 -0.02% | SQQQ 40.22 0.63% | NVDA 219.87 1.12% | KORU 19.58 2.09% | TSLL 9.25 -0.86% | SDST 0.3194 -8.77% | INTC 88.78 -0.21% | AIM 0.2358 -0.08% | GTLB 52.29 15.97% | PCG 13.25 -5.76% | ETHA 17.975 -1.40% | AMBR 0.9296 5.62% | SPCX 140.89 -0.94% | NOK 9.83 -1.01% | ONDS 7.145 1.49% | UPC 4.835 13.23% | BMNR 22.945 -1.82% | DELL 457.28 7.60% | SMCI 37.41 1.91% | IREN 36.475 -0.94% | CONL 5.255 -4.45% | NVD 3.96 -2.22% | FCEL 15.61 -8.61% | HPE 50.89 0.09% | PLTR 173.295 -3.68% | F 14.175 2.42% | SOFI 17.055 0.03% | AAPL 324.956 -0.05% | ASTS 61.35 9.95%

X Financial's Performance in the Competitive Landscape

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. The company operates in a competitive landscape with peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc.

In evaluating X Financial's performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are crucial metrics. X Financial's ROIC is -4.08%, while its WACC is 107.23%. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to a negative ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.038.

Comparatively, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.47%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This suggests that MOGU is also struggling to generate returns above its cost of capital, similar to X Financial.

On the other hand, Viomi Technology Co., Ltd stands out with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.20%, leading to a positive ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.20. This indicates that Viomi is effectively utilizing its capital to generate returns well above its cost, showcasing strong capital efficiency.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also face challenges with negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. These figures highlight the difficulties these companies face in generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: September 17, 2025