| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

X Financial's Performance in the Competitive Landscape

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. The company operates in a competitive landscape with peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc.

In evaluating X Financial's performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are crucial metrics. X Financial's ROIC is -4.08%, while its WACC is 107.23%. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to a negative ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.038.

Comparatively, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.47%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This suggests that MOGU is also struggling to generate returns above its cost of capital, similar to X Financial.

On the other hand, Viomi Technology Co., Ltd stands out with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.20%, leading to a positive ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.20. This indicates that Viomi is effectively utilizing its capital to generate returns well above its cost, showcasing strong capital efficiency.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also face challenges with negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. These figures highlight the difficulties these companies face in generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: September 17, 2025