| ISPC 0.1365 17.17% | CTNT 0.0953 -40.73% | BYND 0.8226 5.19% | YXT 0.496 34.05% | TZA 5.08 -6.45% | EFOI 6.49 210.53% | TSLL 13.9 6.35% | NVDA 201.68 1.68% | BITO 10.63 2.71% | NFLX 97.31 -9.72% | INTC 68.5 0.00% | ZSPC 0.0536 -38.46% | TQQQ 58.59 3.83% | SOXS 18.87 -6.95% | TSLA 400.62 3.01% | XLE 55.02 -2.76% | AMC 1.86 15.53% | SCO 8.47 9.72% | PLUG 2.78 -2.80% | BMNG 1.6 4.58% | IBIT 43.94 2.83% | AAL 12.78 4.16% | BZAI 2.52 45.66% | CRML 12.56 35.49% | SOFI 19.43 2.10% | HIVE 2.51 14.87% | GRAB 4.21 4.73% | SPY 710.14 1.21% | SQQQ 56.39 -3.79% | SOXL 94.68 7.14% | SMR 12.65 10.87% | BMNR 22.95 2.27% | SNAP 6.03 0.17% | UCAR 1.49 29.57% | HIMS 28.82 6.78% | LZMH 0.1736 -84.07% | HYG 80.65 0.37% | DRIP 5.25 9.83% | ONDS 10 -1.96% | DVLT 0.758 -9.49% | AAPL 270.23 2.59% | QQQ 648.85 1.31% | MARA 11.6 0.43% | MSTR 166.52 11.80% | AMZN 250.56 0.34% | PLTR 146.39 2.54% | SPDN 9.13 -1.19% | PBM 7.6 29.47% | IONQ 46.09 3.16% | MSFT 422.79 0.60%

X Financial's Performance in the Competitive Landscape

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. The company operates in a competitive landscape with peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc.

In evaluating X Financial's performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are crucial metrics. X Financial's ROIC is -4.08%, while its WACC is 107.23%. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to a negative ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.038.

Comparatively, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.47%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This suggests that MOGU is also struggling to generate returns above its cost of capital, similar to X Financial.

On the other hand, Viomi Technology Co., Ltd stands out with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.20%, leading to a positive ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.20. This indicates that Viomi is effectively utilizing its capital to generate returns well above its cost, showcasing strong capital efficiency.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also face challenges with negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. These figures highlight the difficulties these companies face in generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: September 17, 2025