| SOXS 1.79 4.07% | NVDA 177.19 -4.16% | ONMD 1.02 44.60% | NFLX 96.24 13.77% | JEM 0.096 3.90% | ENSC 0.6232 57.77% | BYND 0.9456 15.32% | PLUG 1.79 -6.28% | SOFI 17.76 -7.02% | NVD 7.53 8.50% | TZA 6.23 5.06% | NU 14.98 -0.53% | DUST 3.54 -3.50% | BITO 9.06 -2.78% | EOSE 5.695 -15.50% | XLF 51.43 -2.04% | BAC 49.83 -4.72% | AAL 13.07 -6.24% | MARA 8.94 5.80% | VEEA 0.5071 17.33% | SPY 685.99 -0.48% | SOXL 62.77 -3.93% | SLV 84.99 5.64% | XWEL 1.49 9.56% | QQQ 607.29 -0.32% | ONDS 10.08 -3.54% | BHAT 0.0495 -11.13% | PSKY 13.51 20.84% | INTC 45.61 0.33% | F 14.095 -2.19% | AAPL 264.18 -3.21% | XLE 55.92 1.58% | TQQQ 49.52 -1.06% | TSLA 402.51 -1.49% | HYG 80.72 -0.16% | TSDD 9.18 2.91% | TSLL 14.7 -3.10% | BATL 5.52 33.01% | RKT 18.19 2.36% | RXT 1.95 -14.47% | TLT 90.82 0.61% | TSLS 5.64 1.62% | WBD 28.17 -2.19% | PATH 10.73 0.14% | CRWV 79.56 -18.51% | IBIT 37.19 -2.80% | LQD 111.68 -0.04% | SOUN 8.6015 -4.21% | PLTR 137.19 0.92% | CPNG 19.08 1.98%

X Financial's Performance in the Competitive Landscape

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. The company operates in a competitive landscape with peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc.

In evaluating X Financial's performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are crucial metrics. X Financial's ROIC is -4.08%, while its WACC is 107.23%. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to a negative ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.038.

Comparatively, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.47%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This suggests that MOGU is also struggling to generate returns above its cost of capital, similar to X Financial.

On the other hand, Viomi Technology Co., Ltd stands out with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.20%, leading to a positive ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.20. This indicates that Viomi is effectively utilizing its capital to generate returns well above its cost, showcasing strong capital efficiency.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also face challenges with negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. These figures highlight the difficulties these companies face in generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: September 17, 2025