| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

Comparative Analysis of Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR), American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB), and Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC)

Hour Loop, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOUR) is currently trading at $3.65, with a target price of $2.13. This indicates a potential downside of approximately 41.60%. Investment analysts are pessimistic about HOUR, and it is not covered by them. This lack of coverage and the significant price discrepancy suggest caution for potential investors.

In comparison, American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB) is trading at $0.68, with a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation of $1.02. This implies a growth potential of 48.92%, making AREB a potentially more attractive investment. Despite a negative earnings per share (EPS) of -9.68 and no dividend yield, AREB's market cap stands at $5.12 million.

Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. (ENSC) trades at $2.135, with a DCF valuation of $1.832. This results in a negative growth potential of -14.17%. ENSC has a market cap of $5.06 million and an EPS of -3.51. However, it offers a significant dividend yield of 20.39%, which may appeal to income-focused investors.

Comparing these companies, AREB's growth potential stands out, despite its negative earnings. In contrast, HOUR's potential downside and lack of analyst coverage make it less appealing. Investors may find AREB's growth prospects more promising, given its valuation and market position.

Published on: September 7, 2025