| MTEN 0.0401 13.60% | OCG 0.0104 -11.86% | SOXS 2.091 -8.29% | IVP 0.0581 -29.15% | APLT 0.1015 1.60% | BNKK 4.3093 55.01% | ZSL 3.0699 9.06% | SLV 81.2251 -3.94% | SOXL 60.085 8.50% | NVDA 186.66 1.92% | PTHL 0.3983 -9.44% | TQQQ 55.35 2.82% | PCLA 0.2039 -7.74% | INTC 49.95 2.52% | JTAI 0.4932 8.49% | DVLT 0.74 3.04% | MASK 0.3 -0.17% | TSLL 18.445 2.08% | OCUL 12.0799 9.12% | SIDU 3.8793 3.45% | BYND 1.105 14.88% | SXTC 0.1011 4.98% | ASST 0.9772 -5.13% | TSM 340.925 4.22% | MSTX 4.936 -5.08% | RILY 10.34 37.14% | SQQQ 65.05 -2.82% | AMD 232.6 4.03% | QQQ 625.485 0.96% | SAFX 0.1217 -11.36% | ASBP 0.0547 -6.81% | ROLR 21.4199 14.79% | GTBP 0.7257 9.95% | BMNR 32.07 -1.79% | CGTL 3.47 38.80% | SPY 694 0.53% | CRML 16.885 -5.80% | ASNS 0.4789 9.51% | NOK 6.635 4.32% | CRWV 96.8 7.80% | ONDS 13.42 -1.03% | IBIT 54.6242 -1.47% | ETHA 25.355 -0.92% | RGTI 25.88 0.62% | MU 339.62 1.88% | GPUS 0.3182 -0.50% | RZLV 4.139 1.95% | XLE 47.29 -1.60% | GRAB 4.56 -1.51% | PLUG 2.395 1.91%

Liquidia Corporation's Financial Efficiency in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and other related conditions. The company's primary product, YUTREPIA, is an inhaled dry powder formulation of treprostinil. Liquidia operates in a competitive landscape alongside companies like Kezar Life Sciences, Verrica Pharmaceuticals, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, and Scholar Rock Holding Corporation.

In evaluating Liquidia's financial efficiency, the company's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -61.83%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 5.01%. This negative ROIC indicates that Liquidia is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, which is a critical measure of financial health and operational efficiency.

When comparing Liquidia to its peers, Kezar Life Sciences has an even lower ROIC of -72.92% against a WACC of 6.98%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -10.44. This suggests that Kezar is also struggling to generate returns that meet its cost of capital, similar to Liquidia. However, Kezar's ratio is slightly better than Liquidia's -12.35, indicating a marginally less inefficient performance.

Verrica Pharmaceuticals presents a more challenging scenario with a ROIC of -166.93% and a WACC of 17.57%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -9.50. Despite having a higher WACC, Verrica's negative ROIC is the most severe among the peers, highlighting significant inefficiencies in generating returns on its invested capital.

Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, with a ROIC of -34.46% and a WACC of 5.30%, achieves the highest ROIC to WACC ratio of -6.51 among the peers. Although still negative, this ratio suggests that Crinetics is closer to achieving a balance between its returns and cost of capital compared to the other companies in the analysis.

Published on: August 23, 2025