| SOXS 1.79 0.51% | TPET 1.12 166.67% | NVDA 182.48 2.99% | ONDS 10.67 5.85% | STAK 1.04 144.71% | XLE 57.035 1.99% | BITO 9.53 5.19% | TMDE 3.06 231.82% | NVD 7.09 -5.84% | TZA 6.06 -2.73% | NOK 8.26 6.99% | DUST 3.58 1.13% | TURB 1.37 102.84% | F 13.39 -4.97% | TQQQ 49.7 0.36% | RYDE 0.4628 100.00% | PLUG 1.81 1.12% | IBIT 39.213 5.44% | SLV 81.57 -4.02% | EONR 0.5056 17.04% | BHAT 0.039 -21.21% | MSTX 2.51 11.56% | AAL 12.52 -4.21% | TSLS 5.63 -0.18% | SPY 686.34 0.05% | USEG 1.17 9.35% | SOXL 62.76 -0.02% | AES 14.21 -17.77% | NU 15.19 1.40% | NFLX 97.09 0.88% | BATL 11.76 113.04% | QQQ 608.07 0.13% | HYG 80.28 -0.55% | PLTR 145.133 5.79% | SOFI 18.39 3.55% | MARA 9.45 5.70% | XLF 51.3 -0.25% | JDST 1.18 1.72% | SQQQ 70.59 -0.37% | INTC 45.5 -0.24% | ETHA 15.37 5.85% | TSLL 14.74 0.27% | TLT 89.61 -1.33% | TSLA 403.225 0.18% | LQD 110.92 -0.68% | BMNR 20.42 7.59% | IWM 263.82 0.92% | RIG 6.25 -3.55% | NIO 4.72 -3.08% | BKLN 20.21 0.02%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Negative Return on Invested Capital

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA struggles with generating returns on its invested capital.

IZEA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.62%, significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 8.84%. This negative ROIC indicates that IZEA is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to value destruction. The ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.79 further highlights this issue.

In comparison, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) shows a positive ROIC of 37.09%, which is higher than its WACC of 25.14%. This indicates that Remark Holdings is effectively using its capital to generate returns above its cost, creating value for its shareholders. The ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.48 supports this positive outlook.

On the other hand, Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) has a ROIC of -141.38%, which is far below its WACC of 5.61%. This significant negative ROIC suggests substantial value destruction, as the company is not covering its cost of capital. Similarly, Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) also have negative ROICs, indicating they are not generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: November 20, 2025