| FNGR 0.398 129.53% | CHAI 0.4 57.11% | LGCL 0.0389 -27.02% | CYAB 0.4467 45.36% | NVDA 217.55 -4.57% | CHGA 2.852 2,082.10% | PCG 16.6 -7.52% | NCPL 0.6916 28.41% | NVD 4.05 8.58% | BITO 10.45 -3.06% | IREN 35.45 -12.53% | INTC 89.47 -2.85% | NU 14.3 -3.90% | IBIT 43.9 -3.07% | XTNT 0.384 16.36% | TSLL 8.98 -3.54% | ONDS 7.9 -9.71% | DUO 0.9602 37.56% | AAL 13.64 -0.58% | SOAR 0.2169 5.80% | SOXL 111.34 -9.52% | BTAI 0.1814 -74.76% | TQQQ 71.85 -1.98% | ETHA 18.37 -2.65% | FTFT 2.2188 281.50% | SPCX 141.5 0.45% | PATH 18.15 -0.98% | BMNR 23.8 -7.14% | NOK 10.21 -3.59% | AMZN 266.43 3.97% | MRVL 216.62 -10.28% | SOXS 49.82 9.86% | WHLR 1.07 -4.46% | SQQQ 38.54 2.03% | PLUG 2.19 -3.52% | SOFI 18.06 -5.84% | AEMD 2.49 14.75% | SPDN 8.49 0.12% | QID 14.24 1.42% | MARA 10.67 -10.11% | KEEL 3.23 -7.98% | GDX 99.65 -3.90% | RIVN 16.07 -4.35% | F 13.87 -0.57% | BTG 5.66 -2.92% | AAPL 319.7 1.63% | PURR 11.61 -9.51% | SMR 9.29 -4.62% | VALE 15.03 -1.83% | SPY 769.35 -0.23%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Negative Return on Invested Capital

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA struggles with generating returns on its invested capital.

IZEA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.62%, significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 8.84%. This negative ROIC indicates that IZEA is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, leading to value destruction. The ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.79 further highlights this issue.

In comparison, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) shows a positive ROIC of 37.09%, which is higher than its WACC of 25.14%. This indicates that Remark Holdings is effectively using its capital to generate returns above its cost, creating value for its shareholders. The ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.48 supports this positive outlook.

On the other hand, Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) has a ROIC of -141.38%, which is far below its WACC of 5.61%. This significant negative ROIC suggests substantial value destruction, as the company is not covering its cost of capital. Similarly, Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) also have negative ROICs, indicating they are not generating sufficient returns on their invested capital.

Published on: November 20, 2025