| CTNT 0.04 -10.11% | ALP 0.23 -17.86% | FFAI 0.4232 -20.44% | TZA 5.04 -1.95% | BYND 1.1 5.26% | SOXS 16.8 -7.69% | NVDA 202.5 1.31% | NOK 9.825 -5.53% | BITO 10.82 5.15% | INTC 65.27 -1.49% | POET 12.77 24.59% | NVTS 18.47 20.48% | AGPU 8.75 79.30% | BMNG 1.64 14.69% | QVCGA 0.447 11.06% | TQQQ 60.21 4.90% | ONDS 11.06 1.75% | PLUG 3.19 3.57% | ASBP 0.2224 13.01% | AAL 11.5 -2.29% | BURU 0.2811 8.03% | CGC 1.38 21.05% | SOXL 105.64 7.70% | MSOS 5.11 19.39% | SMR 13.58 16.37% | FRMI 5.86 15.81% | TSLA 387.51 0.28% | T 25.97 0.35% | SQQQ 54.73 -4.97% | MARA 11.84 5.43% | IBIT 44.75 5.27% | AMD 303.46 6.67% | TDTH 0.0774 3.48% | BMNR 23.31 7.37% | TSLL 12.93 0.47% | NVD 5.56 -2.63% | MU 487.48 8.48% | SOFI 19.06 1.22% | PLTR 152.62 4.56% | OPEN 5.43 -0.37% | AAPL 273.17 2.63% | GAME 0.6069 33.86% | GPUS 0.1712 11.17% | SPY 711.21 1.01% | BSX 64.87 8.99% | AKAN 10.21 214.15% | SPDN 9.11 -0.98% | GRAB 4.06 -0.49% | BBD 4.04 -0.74% | CPNG 20.6 0.93%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Capital Utilization Compared to Peers

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA's financial metrics reveal challenges in capital utilization.

IZEA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.64%, significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 9.23%. This negative ROIC indicates that IZEA is not generating sufficient returns on its invested capital, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.67. This suggests that the company is underperforming in terms of capital efficiency.

In comparison, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) demonstrates a strong performance with a ROIC of 47.12% and a WACC of 25.14%. MARK's ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.87 indicates that it is effectively generating returns that exceed its cost of capital, highlighting its efficient use of capital.

On the other hand, Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) has a ROIC of -141.38% and a WACC of 9.52%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -14.85. This indicates significant challenges in capital utilization, as VISL's returns are far below its cost of capital.

Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) also face difficulties, with ROIC to WACC ratios of -1.03 and -5.33, respectively. Both companies have negative ROICs, indicating that they are not generating adequate returns on their invested capital compared to their costs.

Published on: August 14, 2025