| SOXS 1.79 4.07% | NVDA 177.19 -4.16% | ONMD 1.02 44.60% | NFLX 96.24 13.77% | JEM 0.096 3.90% | ENSC 0.6232 57.77% | BYND 0.9456 15.32% | PLUG 1.79 -6.28% | SOFI 17.76 -7.02% | NVD 7.53 8.50% | TZA 6.23 5.06% | NU 14.98 -0.53% | DUST 3.54 -3.50% | BITO 9.06 -2.78% | EOSE 5.695 -15.50% | XLF 51.43 -2.04% | BAC 49.83 -4.72% | AAL 13.07 -6.24% | MARA 8.94 5.80% | VEEA 0.5071 17.33% | SPY 685.99 -0.48% | SOXL 62.77 -3.93% | SLV 84.99 5.64% | XWEL 1.49 9.56% | QQQ 607.29 -0.32% | ONDS 10.08 -3.54% | BHAT 0.0495 -11.13% | PSKY 13.51 20.84% | INTC 45.61 0.33% | F 14.095 -2.19% | AAPL 264.18 -3.21% | XLE 55.92 1.58% | TQQQ 49.52 -1.06% | TSLA 402.51 -1.49% | HYG 80.72 -0.16% | TSDD 9.18 2.91% | TSLL 14.7 -3.10% | BATL 5.52 33.01% | RKT 18.19 2.36% | RXT 1.95 -14.47% | TLT 90.82 0.61% | TSLS 5.64 1.62% | WBD 28.17 -2.19% | PATH 10.73 0.14% | CRWV 79.56 -18.51% | IBIT 37.19 -2.80% | LQD 111.68 -0.04% | SOUN 8.6015 -4.21% | PLTR 137.19 0.92% | CPNG 19.08 1.98%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Capital Utilization Compared to Peers

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA's financial metrics reveal challenges in capital utilization.

IZEA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.64%, significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 9.23%. This negative ROIC indicates that IZEA is not generating sufficient returns on its invested capital, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.67. This suggests that the company is underperforming in terms of capital efficiency.

In comparison, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) demonstrates a strong performance with a ROIC of 47.12% and a WACC of 25.14%. MARK's ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.87 indicates that it is effectively generating returns that exceed its cost of capital, highlighting its efficient use of capital.

On the other hand, Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) has a ROIC of -141.38% and a WACC of 9.52%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -14.85. This indicates significant challenges in capital utilization, as VISL's returns are far below its cost of capital.

Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) also face difficulties, with ROIC to WACC ratios of -1.03 and -5.33, respectively. Both companies have negative ROICs, indicating that they are not generating adequate returns on their invested capital compared to their costs.

Published on: August 14, 2025