| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Capital Utilization Compared to Peers

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA's financial metrics reveal challenges in capital utilization.

IZEA's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.64%, significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 9.23%. This negative ROIC indicates that IZEA is not generating sufficient returns on its invested capital, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.67. This suggests that the company is underperforming in terms of capital efficiency.

In comparison, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) demonstrates a strong performance with a ROIC of 47.12% and a WACC of 25.14%. MARK's ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.87 indicates that it is effectively generating returns that exceed its cost of capital, highlighting its efficient use of capital.

On the other hand, Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) has a ROIC of -141.38% and a WACC of 9.52%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -14.85. This indicates significant challenges in capital utilization, as VISL's returns are far below its cost of capital.

Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) also face difficulties, with ROIC to WACC ratios of -1.03 and -5.33, respectively. Both companies have negative ROICs, indicating that they are not generating adequate returns on their invested capital compared to their costs.

Published on: August 14, 2025