| GPRO 1.2599 43.79% | LIDR 1.395 21.30% | RITR 0.0964 4.78% | HKPD 0.2607 -21.78% | FLYE 1.829 34.49% | RZLV 2.34 -19.03% | NIO 4.155 -1.77% | NVDA 218.98 -0.82% | TSLL 9.52 -4.51% | NVD 4 1.78% | BIAF 6.4599 41.66% | INTC 88.98 -0.59% | AIM 0.235 3.98% | SOXL 106.7 -5.40% | TQQQ 69.955 -2.73% | BITO 10.475 -1.46% | NCPL 0.7959 11.22% | SOXS 51.735 5.54% | PCG 13.43 1.21% | SPCX 144.17 0.33% | NOK 9.905 -2.32% | IBIT 44.055 -1.38% | NU 14.675 0.86% | AAPL 324.4554 2.40% | ONDS 7.155 -6.55% | SQQQ 39.555 2.71% | SSM 3.8951 45.34% | FRVO 19.14 24.45% | SGOV 100.405 -0.28% | GYGY 1.4099 18.48% | RDAC 7.6649 68.09% | AAL 13.195 -1.75% | PFE 28.63 0.60% | BTG 5.305 -3.19% | BMNR 24.11 -4.78% | TSLA 359.69 -2.24% | AUUD 1.03 4.34% | ZEO 0.1956 -17.71% | SOFI 17.295 -3.27% | GRAB 3.575 0.99% | HYG 79.24 -0.71% | PLUG 2.1248 -1.63% | SPDN 8.565 0.41% | AMBR 0.9639 -16.91% | IREN 37.0251 -0.24% | PATH 18.306 -1.95% | BBD 3.325 1.37% | F 13.86 -0.54% | OPEN 3.12 -2.50% | ALMS 9.0795 -58.37%

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ:TUSK) Financial Performance Analysis

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ:TUSK) is a company involved in providing oilfield services, infrastructure services, and energy logistics. It operates in a competitive industry with peers like KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE), Select Energy Services, Inc. (WTTR), Smart Sand, Inc. (SND), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM), and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). These companies are all part of the energy sector, focusing on various services related to oil and gas production.

In evaluating TUSK's financial performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are crucial metrics. TUSK's ROIC is -21.61%, which is significantly lower than its WACC of 19.41%. This results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -1.11, indicating that TUSK is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital. This is a red flag for investors as it suggests inefficiency in capital utilization.

Comparing TUSK to its peers, KLXE has a ROIC of -11.77% and a WACC of 10.91%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -1.08. Although KLXE is also underperforming, its ratio is slightly better than TUSK's. On the other hand, WTTR shows a positive ROIC of 3.07% against a WACC of 9.05%, with a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.34, indicating better capital efficiency compared to TUSK.

Among the peers, NCSM stands out with a ROIC of 6.40% and a WACC of 6.65%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.96. This suggests that NCSM is almost covering its cost of capital, making it the most efficient in capital utilization among the companies listed. This performance highlights NCSM as a potentially more attractive investment option for those seeking better capital efficiency.

In contrast, PUMP has a ROIC of -16.02% and a WACC of 7.79%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.05, which is worse than TUSK's. This comparison shows that while TUSK is underperforming, it is not the least efficient among its peers. However, investors might still prefer companies like NCSM, which demonstrate a positive ROIC to WACC ratio, indicating more effective capital utilization.

Published on: August 12, 2025