| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

BIO-key International, Inc. (NASDAQ:BKYI) Struggles with Capital Utilization Amidst Biometric Innovation

BIO-key International, Inc. (NASDAQ:BKYI) specializes in providing biometric authentication solutions to enhance security and identity verification across various industries. Despite its innovative offerings, BIO-key faces challenges in effectively utilizing its capital, as indicated by its financial metrics.

BIO-key's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -50.67%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 10.09%. This negative ROIC suggests that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital. The ROIC to WACC ratio of -5.02 further highlights this inefficiency in capital utilization.

When compared to its peers, BIO-key's performance is not unique. Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX) also report negative ROICs of -30.16% and -34.34%, respectively, with WACCs of 20.91% and 22.78%. Their ROIC to WACC ratios of -1.44 and -1.51 indicate similar struggles in generating returns above their cost of capital.

Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) face even greater challenges, with ROICs of -622.64% and -175.44%, respectively. Their ROIC to WACC ratios of -86.80 and -34.06 reflect significant inefficiencies in capital utilization, suggesting that these companies are far from covering their cost of capital.

In contrast, SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB) stands out with a positive ROIC of 2.63% and a WACC of 7.11%. Its ROIC to WACC ratio is 0.37. This positions SuperCom Ltd. as a more effective user of capital, highlighting its potential for growth compared to its peers.

Published on: September 9, 2025