| TOVX 0.41 59.41% | FCHL 0.225 -37.22% | CTNT 0.0548 -42.50% | CMND 1.14 58.42% | BYND 1.16 41.02% | ENVB 3.65 100.55% | WLDS 1.3 -13.91% | TZA 5 -1.57% | LZMH 0.155 -10.71% | NVDA 202.06 0.19% | PLUG 3.22 15.83% | BITO 10.46 -1.60% | TSLL 13.29 -4.39% | INTC 65.7 -4.09% | ONDS 10.73 7.30% | NOK 10.61 2.91% | SOXS 18.63 -1.27% | BMNG 1.55 -3.13% | HIMS 31.01 7.60% | TQQQ 58.08 -0.87% | TSLA 392.5 -2.03% | NFLX 94.83 -2.55% | AAL 12.24 -4.23% | FRMI 5.4 -17.56% | SLNH 1.4 23.89% | BB 5.5 13.17% | NVD 5.59 -0.53% | QXO 24.22 -3.12% | SOFI 19.5 0.36% | SPDN 9.14 0.11% | IONQ 48.32 4.84% | SOXL 95.94 1.33% | SNAP 6 -0.50% | ATAI 4.9 21.59% | GRAB 4.21 0.00% | SQQQ 56.91 0.92% | POET 8.59 18.32% | SIDU 4.34 -18.88% | USAR 22.58 13.18% | MARA 11.63 0.26% | SPY 708.72 -0.20% | PBM 11.3 48.68% | DRIP 5.16 -1.71% | CMPS 9.46 42.04% | ASTS 81 -5.30% | MRVL 147.84 5.83% | BTG 4.94 -1.20% | SRXH 0.1198 -5.67% | QBTS 21.655 -0.16% | ZSPC 1.54 2,400.00%

BIO-key International, Inc. (NASDAQ:BKYI) Struggles with Capital Utilization Amidst Biometric Innovation

BIO-key International, Inc. (NASDAQ:BKYI) specializes in providing biometric authentication solutions to enhance security and identity verification across various industries. Despite its innovative offerings, BIO-key faces challenges in effectively utilizing its capital, as indicated by its financial metrics.

BIO-key's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -50.67%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 10.09%. This negative ROIC suggests that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital. The ROIC to WACC ratio of -5.02 further highlights this inefficiency in capital utilization.

When compared to its peers, BIO-key's performance is not unique. Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) and Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX) also report negative ROICs of -30.16% and -34.34%, respectively, with WACCs of 20.91% and 22.78%. Their ROIC to WACC ratios of -1.44 and -1.51 indicate similar struggles in generating returns above their cost of capital.

Senmiao Technology Limited (AIHS) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) face even greater challenges, with ROICs of -622.64% and -175.44%, respectively. Their ROIC to WACC ratios of -86.80 and -34.06 reflect significant inefficiencies in capital utilization, suggesting that these companies are far from covering their cost of capital.

In contrast, SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB) stands out with a positive ROIC of 2.63% and a WACC of 7.11%. Its ROIC to WACC ratio is 0.37. This positions SuperCom Ltd. as a more effective user of capital, highlighting its potential for growth compared to its peers.

Published on: September 9, 2025