| SOXS 1.79 4.07% | NVDA 177.19 -4.16% | ONMD 1.02 44.60% | NFLX 96.24 13.77% | JEM 0.096 3.90% | ENSC 0.6232 57.77% | BYND 0.9456 15.32% | PLUG 1.79 -6.28% | SOFI 17.76 -7.02% | NVD 7.53 8.50% | TZA 6.23 5.06% | NU 14.98 -0.53% | DUST 3.54 -3.50% | BITO 9.06 -2.78% | EOSE 5.695 -15.50% | XLF 51.43 -2.04% | BAC 49.83 -4.72% | AAL 13.07 -6.24% | MARA 8.94 5.80% | VEEA 0.5071 17.33% | SPY 685.99 -0.48% | SOXL 62.77 -3.93% | SLV 84.99 5.64% | XWEL 1.49 9.56% | QQQ 607.29 -0.32% | ONDS 10.08 -3.54% | BHAT 0.0495 -11.13% | PSKY 13.51 20.84% | INTC 45.61 0.33% | F 14.095 -2.19% | AAPL 264.18 -3.21% | XLE 55.92 1.58% | TQQQ 49.52 -1.06% | TSLA 402.51 -1.49% | HYG 80.72 -0.16% | TSDD 9.18 2.91% | TSLL 14.7 -3.10% | BATL 5.52 33.01% | RKT 18.19 2.36% | RXT 1.95 -14.47% | TLT 90.82 0.61% | TSLS 5.64 1.62% | WBD 28.17 -2.19% | PATH 10.73 0.14% | CRWV 79.56 -18.51% | IBIT 37.19 -2.80% | LQD 111.68 -0.04% | SOUN 8.6015 -4.21% | PLTR 137.19 0.92% | CPNG 19.08 1.98%

X Financial's Capital Utilization in Comparison with Peers

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. In the competitive landscape, X Financial faces peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc., each with varying efficiencies in capital utilization.

X Financial's ROIC of -4.08% against a WACC of 105.07% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.0389. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, highlighting inefficiencies in its capital utilization. This negative ratio suggests that X Financial is struggling to create value for its investors.

In comparison, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.46%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This significantly negative ratio indicates even poorer capital efficiency than X Financial, as MOGU Inc. is far from covering its cost of capital. This suggests that MOGU Inc. is facing substantial challenges in generating returns.

Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, however, presents a stark contrast with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.19%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.25. This positive ratio indicates strong capital efficiency, as Viomi Technology is generating returns well above its cost of capital. This makes Viomi Technology a standout performer among its peers.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also show negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. Both companies are facing challenges in generating returns that cover their cost of capital, similar to X Financial. However, their ratios are less negative than MOGU Inc., indicating relatively better, yet still inefficient, capital utilization.

Published on: September 7, 2025