| FAMI 0.1501 26.45% | GPRO 1.69 37.40% | RITR 0.0987 11.90% | NVDA 224.41 3.21% | NVD 3.79 -6.42% | MGN 0.13 8.70% | PCG 13.33 -5.19% | GPUS 0.1984 -17.09% | LHAI 1.1 34.02% | TSLL 9.37 0.43% | NU 15.4 6.50% | ONDS 7.61 8.10% | VIVK 0.9011 14.95% | PPBT 1.98 19.28% | EOSE 3.61 18.75% | NIO 3.855 -4.93% | BITO 10.4 0.24% | INTC 90.05 1.21% | PATH 17.99 -0.83% | GELS 0.7 31.58% | F 14.15 2.24% | CNH 13.65 9.20% | RIG 6.22 5.07% | HPE 51.855 1.94% | AAL 13.11 1.24% | VIOT 1.78 83.64% | SPCX 140.71 -1.07% | NOK 9.84 -0.91% | BTAI 0.107 -21.90% | BBD 3.45 3.92% | BIAF 9.75 47.95% | SOXL 106.35 0.42% | SOXS 51.83 -0.75% | SOFI 17.84 4.63% | PLUG 2.09 0.00% | IREN 39.6 7.55% | EWZ 38.09 4.16% | PLTR 169.46 -5.81% | PFE 29.02 1.65% | TQQQ 69.6 0.65% | NCPL 1.03 30.05% | DELL 492 15.76% | CDE 21.42 6.04% | HYG 79.11 0.01% | TSLA 357.01 0.26% | T 25.96 -0.15% | AAPL 324.96 -0.05% | SQQQ 39.71 -0.65% | SMCI 37 0.79% | XLF 57.66 0.80%

X Financial's Capital Utilization in Comparison with Peers

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. In the competitive landscape, X Financial faces peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc., each with varying efficiencies in capital utilization.

X Financial's ROIC of -4.08% against a WACC of 105.07% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.0389. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, highlighting inefficiencies in its capital utilization. This negative ratio suggests that X Financial is struggling to create value for its investors.

In comparison, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.46%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This significantly negative ratio indicates even poorer capital efficiency than X Financial, as MOGU Inc. is far from covering its cost of capital. This suggests that MOGU Inc. is facing substantial challenges in generating returns.

Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, however, presents a stark contrast with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.19%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.25. This positive ratio indicates strong capital efficiency, as Viomi Technology is generating returns well above its cost of capital. This makes Viomi Technology a standout performer among its peers.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also show negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. Both companies are facing challenges in generating returns that cover their cost of capital, similar to X Financial. However, their ratios are less negative than MOGU Inc., indicating relatively better, yet still inefficient, capital utilization.

Published on: September 7, 2025