| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

X Financial's Capital Utilization in Comparison with Peers

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. In the competitive landscape, X Financial faces peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc., each with varying efficiencies in capital utilization.

X Financial's ROIC of -4.08% against a WACC of 105.07% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.0389. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, highlighting inefficiencies in its capital utilization. This negative ratio suggests that X Financial is struggling to create value for its investors.

In comparison, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.46%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This significantly negative ratio indicates even poorer capital efficiency than X Financial, as MOGU Inc. is far from covering its cost of capital. This suggests that MOGU Inc. is facing substantial challenges in generating returns.

Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, however, presents a stark contrast with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.19%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.25. This positive ratio indicates strong capital efficiency, as Viomi Technology is generating returns well above its cost of capital. This makes Viomi Technology a standout performer among its peers.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also show negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. Both companies are facing challenges in generating returns that cover their cost of capital, similar to X Financial. However, their ratios are less negative than MOGU Inc., indicating relatively better, yet still inefficient, capital utilization.

Published on: September 7, 2025