| SOXS 1.86 3.62% | TPET 0.9842 134.33% | STAK 0.7077 66.52% | TMDE 2.29 148.32% | ONDS 11.235 11.46% | NVDA 181.33 2.34% | TURB 1.1 62.87% | EONR 0.4942 14.40% | USEG 1.135 6.07% | BHAT 0.038 -23.23% | NOK 8.015 3.75% | XLE 57 1.93% | DUST 3.69 4.21% | SLV 79.7649 -6.15% | IBIT 39.48 6.16% | F 13.325 -5.43% | TQQQ 49.05 -0.95% | BITO 9.6029 5.99% | PLUG 1.7966 0.37% | SOXL 60.57 -3.50% | AES 14.275 -17.39% | MSTX 2.5698 14.21% | BATL 9.615 74.18% | NVD 7.1701 -4.78% | TSLL 14.613 -0.59% | TSLS 5.65 0.18% | JDST 1.2233 5.46% | NFLX 96.295 0.06% | TZA 6.2001 -0.48% | PLTR 144.695 5.47% | SQQQ 71.525 0.95% | SPY 684.43 -0.23% | XLF 51.2855 -0.28% | QQQ 605.36 -0.32% | MARA 9.7107 8.62% | ETHA 15.601 7.44% | INTC 44.905 -1.55% | AAL 12.41 -5.05% | BANL 0.6469 43.28% | SOFI 17.875 0.65% | CRCG 3.0488 27.03% | HYG 80.165 -0.20% | RYDE 0.46 98.79% | IWM 261.755 0.13% | VG 11.37 17.34% | BYND 0.8665 -8.37% | TLT 89.515 -1.44% | TSLA 401.46 -0.26% | NIO 4.695 -3.60% | BMNR 20.8699 9.96%

X Financial's Capital Utilization in Comparison with Peers

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. In the competitive landscape, X Financial faces peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc., each with varying efficiencies in capital utilization.

X Financial's ROIC of -4.08% against a WACC of 105.07% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.0389. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, highlighting inefficiencies in its capital utilization. This negative ratio suggests that X Financial is struggling to create value for its investors.

In comparison, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.46%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This significantly negative ratio indicates even poorer capital efficiency than X Financial, as MOGU Inc. is far from covering its cost of capital. This suggests that MOGU Inc. is facing substantial challenges in generating returns.

Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, however, presents a stark contrast with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.19%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.25. This positive ratio indicates strong capital efficiency, as Viomi Technology is generating returns well above its cost of capital. This makes Viomi Technology a standout performer among its peers.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also show negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. Both companies are facing challenges in generating returns that cover their cost of capital, similar to X Financial. However, their ratios are less negative than MOGU Inc., indicating relatively better, yet still inefficient, capital utilization.

Published on: September 7, 2025