| BURU 0.376 33.76% | CTNT 0.0342 -14.50% | TZA 5.135 1.88% | SOXS 16.12 -4.05% | NOK 10.2587 4.04% | PAPL 0.9346 55.66% | TSLL 11.935 -7.70% | BITO 10.655 -1.52% | QS 7.445 1.85% | INTC 66.0934 1.26% | NVDA 199.104 -1.68% | BYND 0.9728 -11.56% | SOXL 109.97 4.10% | TQQQ 58.82 -2.31% | TSLA 372.57 -3.86% | SPDN 9.1603 0.55% | BMNG 1.4401 -12.19% | AUUD 4.77 23.26% | AIXI 1.05 17.34% | MEHA 0.1079 -16.36% | NVD 5.7599 3.60% | SQQQ 56.0195 2.36% | MWYN 0.6652 16.91% | AAL 11.68 1.57% | SMR 12.4851 -7.99% | KEEL 3.2296 6.24% | PLUG 3.155 -1.10% | CGC 1.225 -11.23% | CPIX 3.98 30.49% | IREN 51.6899 6.82% | APLD 36.14 11.44% | PLTR 141.33 -7.40% | NVTS 18.2701 -1.08% | ONDS 10.535 -4.75% | SOFI 18.225 -4.38% | SPY 707.33 -0.55% | POET 11.715 -8.26% | SCO 7.16 -5.04% | HIMS 28.065 -3.24% | SMCI 26.695 -8.52% | TLRY 6.895 -12.39% | MSOS 4.455 -12.82% | MARA 11.855 0.13% | SNAP 5.535 -5.22% | GRAB 3.95 -2.71% | YCBD 0.9977 7.28% | XLF 51.695 -0.99% | FFAI 0.3858 -8.84% | CMCSA 31.7219 8.01% | QID 17.86 1.53%

X Financial's Capital Utilization in Comparison with Peers

X Financial (NYSE:XYF) is a financial technology company that provides personal finance services in China. It offers a range of products, including loan facilitation and wealth management services. In the competitive landscape, X Financial faces peers like MOGU Inc., Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc., and 111, Inc., each with varying efficiencies in capital utilization.

X Financial's ROIC of -4.08% against a WACC of 105.07% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.0389. This indicates that the company is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, highlighting inefficiencies in its capital utilization. This negative ratio suggests that X Financial is struggling to create value for its investors.

In comparison, MOGU Inc. has a ROIC of -10.23% and a WACC of 3.46%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.95. This significantly negative ratio indicates even poorer capital efficiency than X Financial, as MOGU Inc. is far from covering its cost of capital. This suggests that MOGU Inc. is facing substantial challenges in generating returns.

Viomi Technology Co., Ltd, however, presents a stark contrast with a ROIC of 84.77% and a WACC of 4.19%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 20.25. This positive ratio indicates strong capital efficiency, as Viomi Technology is generating returns well above its cost of capital. This makes Viomi Technology a standout performer among its peers.

Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. and 111, Inc. also show negative ROIC to WACC ratios of -0.12 and -0.03, respectively. Both companies are facing challenges in generating returns that cover their cost of capital, similar to X Financial. However, their ratios are less negative than MOGU Inc., indicating relatively better, yet still inefficient, capital utilization.

Published on: September 7, 2025