| PTLE 0.282 51.53% | SOXS 3.65 11.56% | MSPR 0.664 27.57% | SCNX 0.8182 15.35% | NVDA 198.69 -3.96% | SQQQ 13.79 6.16% | ORIS 0.1603 -0.12% | BYND 1.33 -4.32% | PFE 24.3 -1.46% | HTZ 6.73 36.23% | PLTR 190.74 -7.94% | TSLL 20.34 -10.16% | ETHA 24.28 -10.37% | ASST 1.25 -1.57% | IBIT 57.18 -5.53% | GRAB 5.785 -4.70% | INTC 37.03 -6.25% | PLUG 2.52 -8.36% | ONDS 5.96 -3.09% | OPEN 6.92 -8.83% | CHR 0.136 8.11% | FGL 0.5165 26.94% | DNN 2.74 -6.00% | TSLA 444.26 -5.15% | WTO 0.0497 -6.23% | CAPT 0.6615 31.77% | NFE 1.35 14.41% | SOXL 42.8 -11.90% | BITF 3.84 -6.57% | ETHD 5.26 20.92% | T 24.44 -0.37% | EPWK 0.0748 3.60% | F 12.79 -1.69% | SPY 675.24 -1.19% | SOFI 29.37 -4.11% | KVUE 15.97 -1.05% | ACHR 9.56 -8.25% | CIFR 22.51 -1.10% | QQQ 619.25 -2.03% | HIMS 42.79 -3.60% | GPUS 0.3494 -7.03% | TQQQ 111.08 -6.12% | LQD 110.68 0.14% | BTBT 3.18 -7.02% | AAL 12.65 -5.17% | TZA 8.21 5.26% | BURU 0.29 -7.91% | NCLH 18.79 -15.28% | RGTI 35.18 -10.07% | BTG 4 -5.77%

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) Struggles with Negative Return on Invested Capital

IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:IZEA) operates in the influencer marketing and content creation space, connecting brands with content creators. Despite its innovative approach, IZEA faces significant challenges in generating returns on its invested capital. This is evident from its ROIC of -24.62%, which is substantially lower than its WACC of 9.76%. The ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.52 further underscores this underperformance, indicating that IZEA is not effectively utilizing its capital to generate value.

In contrast, Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) demonstrates strong performance with a ROIC of 47.12% and a WACC of 25.15%. Its positive ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.87 suggests that MARK is efficiently using its capital to create value, distinguishing itself among its peers. This comparison highlights the importance of effective capital utilization in achieving financial success within the industry.

Other companies like Vislink Technologies, Inc. (VISL) and Boxlight Corporation (BOXL) also struggle with negative ROICs of -141.38% and -30.16%, respectively. Their ROIC to WACC ratios of -13.59 and -1.44 indicate that, similar to IZEA, they are not generating returns sufficient to cover their cost of capital. This underscores the challenges faced by companies in this sector in effectively utilizing their capital.

Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) faces similar challenges with a ROIC of -42.40% and a WACC of 8.55%. Its ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.96 further emphasizes the difficulty in generating returns above the cost of capital. This comparison underscores the importance of effective capital utilization in achieving financial success in the industry.

Published on: September 5, 2025