| BYND 1.17 0.86% | CTNT 0.0388 -29.20% | FCHL 0.2876 27.82% | FFAI 0.4721 64.67% | LOBO 0.725 26.62% | ASBP 0.1949 -25.58% | RPGL 0.6384 41.90% | TZA 5.075 1.60% | XRTX 2.725 21.11% | LOCL 2.7304 45.23% | EDBL 0.7849 -14.68% | BITO 10.4101 -0.48% | SOXS 18.0999 -2.85% | NVTS 15.575 17.99% | BURU 0.2301 15.05% | INTC 66.515 1.24% | PLUG 3.0999 -3.73% | NVDA 200.15 -0.95% | ONDS 10.9199 1.77% | OPEN 5.82 8.79% | POET 10.3 19.91% | SOWG 0.1595 -33.51% | TSLL 13.04 -1.88% | TQQQ 57.91 -0.29% | NOK 10.455 -1.37% | TOVX 0.3243 -20.90% | HIMS 29.805 -3.89% | SOXL 98.64 2.81% | SOUN 7.905 -4.99% | BMNG 1.5101 -2.57% | SLNH 1.5176 8.40% | CLIK 3.46 34.63% | SOFI 19.168 -1.70% | LCID 7.335 8.67% | SQQQ 57.08 0.30% | SPDN 9.175 0.38% | HYG 80.435 -0.18% | SNAP 5.725 -4.58% | SMR 11.995 -6.22% | AAL 11.88 -2.94% | TSLA 389 -0.89% | NVD 5.6984 1.94% | NFLX 93.2855 -1.63% | BULL 7.12 1.57% | PLTR 146.67 0.53% | BIYA 1.1902 36.79% | HTZ 7.04 -9.86% | BTG 4.94 0.00% | TDIC 0.9913 48.07% | BBAI 3.845 0.26%

UP Fintech Holding Ltd. (NASDAQ:TIGR) Financial Performance and Industry Comparison

UP Fintech Holding Ltd. (NASDAQ:TIGR) is a leading online brokerage firm that provides a range of financial services, including trading and wealth management, primarily targeting Chinese investors. The company operates in a competitive landscape alongside peers like Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and Qifu Technology, Inc. (QFIN), which also offer similar financial services.

In evaluating TIGR's financial performance, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is a key metric. TIGR's ROIC is 2.83%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 8.80%. This results in a ROIC/WACC ratio of 0.32, indicating that TIGR is not generating sufficient returns to cover its cost of capital.

Comparatively, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) has a ROIC of 5.10% and a WACC of 5.54%, resulting in a ROIC/WACC ratio of 0.92. This suggests that FUTU is closer to covering its cost of capital, though still not exceeding it. Meanwhile, Qifu Technology, Inc. (QFIN) outperforms with a ROIC of 9.81% against a WACC of 5.62%, achieving a ROIC/WACC ratio of 1.75, indicating efficient capital utilization.

KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) and Bilibili Inc. (BILI) also show varying levels of capital efficiency. BEKE has a ROIC of 1.58% and a WACC of 4.52%, resulting in a ROIC/WACC ratio of 0.35, slightly better than TIGR. BILI, with a ROIC of 4.28% and a WACC of 7.33%, achieves a ROIC/WACC ratio of 0.58, indicating better capital efficiency.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) leads the pack with a ROIC of 12.75% and a WACC of 6.77%, resulting in a ROIC/WACC ratio of 1.89. This highlights TME's superior ability to generate returns well above its cost of capital, setting a benchmark for capital efficiency in the industry.

Published on: March 23, 2026